6 × 2 pt: Forecasting gains from joint weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses with spectroscopic-photometric galaxy cross-correlations

Harry Johnston*, Nora Elisa Chisari*, Shahab Joudaki*, Robert Reischke, Benjamin Stölzner, Arthur Loureiro, Constance Mahony, Sandra Unruh, Angus H. Wright, Marika Asgari, MacIej Bilicki, Pierre Burger, Andrej Dvornik, Christos Georgiou, Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Benjamin Joachimi, Konrad Kuijken, Shun Sheng LiLaila Linke, Lucas Porth, Huan Yuan Shan, Tilman Tröster, Jan Luca Van Den Busch, Maximilian Von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Ziang Yan, Yun Hao Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accurate knowledge of galaxy redshift distributions is crucial in the inference of cosmological parameters from large-scale structure data. We explore the potential for enhanced self-calibration of photometric galaxy redshift distributions, n(z), through the joint analysis of up to six two-point functions. Our 3 × 2 pt configuration comprises photometric shear, spectroscopic galaxy clustering, and spectroscopic-photometric galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL). We expand this to include spectroscopic-photometric cross-clustering, photometric GGL, and photometric auto-clustering, using the photometric shear sample as an additional density tracer. We performed simulated likelihood forecasts of the cosmological and nuisance parameter constraints for stage-III- and stage-IV-like surveys. For the stage-III-like survey, we employed realistic redshift distributions with perturbations across the full shape of the n(z), and distinguished between 'coherent' shifting of the bulk distribution in one direction, versus more internal scattering and full-shape n(z) errors. For perfectly known n(z), a 6 × 2 pt analysis gains ∼40% in figure of merit (FoM) on the S8 ≈ σ8√Ωm/0.3 and Ωm plane relative to the 3 × 2 pt analysis. If untreated, coherent and incoherent redshift errors lead to inaccurate inferences of S8 and Ωm, respectively, and contaminate inferences of the amplitude of intrinsic galaxy alignments. Employing bin-wise scalar shifts, δzi, in the tomographic mean redshifts reduces cosmological parameter biases, with a 6 × 2 pt analysis constraining the δzi parameters with 2-4 times the precision of a photometric 3ph × 2 pt analysis. For the stage-IV-like survey, a 6 × 2 pt analysis doubles the FoM (σ8m) compared to the 3 × 2 pt or 3ph × 2 pt analyses, and is only 8% less constraining than if the n(z) were perfectly known. A Gaussian mixture model for the n(z) is able to reduce mean-redshift errors whilst preserving the n(z) shape, and thereby yields the most accurate and precise cosmological constraints for any given N × 2 pt configuration in the presence of n(z) biases.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA127
Number of pages35
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume699
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025

Keywords

  • Cosmological parameters
  • Cosmology: observations
  • Dark energy
  • Large-scale structure of Universe
  • UKRI
  • EPSRC
  • EP/Y03015X/1
  • STFC
  • ST/V000780/1
  • ST/Y002652/1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '6 × 2 pt: Forecasting gains from joint weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses with spectroscopic-photometric galaxy cross-correlations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this