TY - JOUR
T1 - 6 × 2 pt
T2 - Forecasting gains from joint weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses with spectroscopic-photometric galaxy cross-correlations
AU - Johnston, Harry
AU - Elisa Chisari, Nora
AU - Joudaki, Shahab
AU - Reischke, Robert
AU - Stölzner, Benjamin
AU - Loureiro, Arthur
AU - Mahony, Constance
AU - Unruh, Sandra
AU - Wright, Angus H.
AU - Asgari, Marika
AU - Bilicki, MacIej
AU - Burger, Pierre
AU - Dvornik, Andrej
AU - Georgiou, Christos
AU - Giblin, Benjamin
AU - Heymans, Catherine
AU - Hildebrandt, Hendrik
AU - Joachimi, Benjamin
AU - Kuijken, Konrad
AU - Li, Shun Sheng
AU - Linke, Laila
AU - Porth, Lucas
AU - Shan, Huan Yuan
AU - Tröster, Tilman
AU - Van Den Busch, Jan Luca
AU - Von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Maximilian
AU - Yan, Ziang
AU - Zhang, Yun Hao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors 2025.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Accurate knowledge of galaxy redshift distributions is crucial in the inference of cosmological parameters from large-scale structure data. We explore the potential for enhanced self-calibration of photometric galaxy redshift distributions, n(z), through the joint analysis of up to six two-point functions. Our 3 × 2 pt configuration comprises photometric shear, spectroscopic galaxy clustering, and spectroscopic-photometric galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL). We expand this to include spectroscopic-photometric cross-clustering, photometric GGL, and photometric auto-clustering, using the photometric shear sample as an additional density tracer. We performed simulated likelihood forecasts of the cosmological and nuisance parameter constraints for stage-III- and stage-IV-like surveys. For the stage-III-like survey, we employed realistic redshift distributions with perturbations across the full shape of the n(z), and distinguished between 'coherent' shifting of the bulk distribution in one direction, versus more internal scattering and full-shape n(z) errors. For perfectly known n(z), a 6 × 2 pt analysis gains ∼40% in figure of merit (FoM) on the S8 ≈ σ8√Ωm/0.3 and Ωm plane relative to the 3 × 2 pt analysis. If untreated, coherent and incoherent redshift errors lead to inaccurate inferences of S8 and Ωm, respectively, and contaminate inferences of the amplitude of intrinsic galaxy alignments. Employing bin-wise scalar shifts, δzi, in the tomographic mean redshifts reduces cosmological parameter biases, with a 6 × 2 pt analysis constraining the δzi parameters with 2-4 times the precision of a photometric 3ph × 2 pt analysis. For the stage-IV-like survey, a 6 × 2 pt analysis doubles the FoM (σ8-Ωm) compared to the 3 × 2 pt or 3ph × 2 pt analyses, and is only 8% less constraining than if the n(z) were perfectly known. A Gaussian mixture model for the n(z) is able to reduce mean-redshift errors whilst preserving the n(z) shape, and thereby yields the most accurate and precise cosmological constraints for any given N × 2 pt configuration in the presence of n(z) biases.
AB - Accurate knowledge of galaxy redshift distributions is crucial in the inference of cosmological parameters from large-scale structure data. We explore the potential for enhanced self-calibration of photometric galaxy redshift distributions, n(z), through the joint analysis of up to six two-point functions. Our 3 × 2 pt configuration comprises photometric shear, spectroscopic galaxy clustering, and spectroscopic-photometric galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL). We expand this to include spectroscopic-photometric cross-clustering, photometric GGL, and photometric auto-clustering, using the photometric shear sample as an additional density tracer. We performed simulated likelihood forecasts of the cosmological and nuisance parameter constraints for stage-III- and stage-IV-like surveys. For the stage-III-like survey, we employed realistic redshift distributions with perturbations across the full shape of the n(z), and distinguished between 'coherent' shifting of the bulk distribution in one direction, versus more internal scattering and full-shape n(z) errors. For perfectly known n(z), a 6 × 2 pt analysis gains ∼40% in figure of merit (FoM) on the S8 ≈ σ8√Ωm/0.3 and Ωm plane relative to the 3 × 2 pt analysis. If untreated, coherent and incoherent redshift errors lead to inaccurate inferences of S8 and Ωm, respectively, and contaminate inferences of the amplitude of intrinsic galaxy alignments. Employing bin-wise scalar shifts, δzi, in the tomographic mean redshifts reduces cosmological parameter biases, with a 6 × 2 pt analysis constraining the δzi parameters with 2-4 times the precision of a photometric 3ph × 2 pt analysis. For the stage-IV-like survey, a 6 × 2 pt analysis doubles the FoM (σ8-Ωm) compared to the 3 × 2 pt or 3ph × 2 pt analyses, and is only 8% less constraining than if the n(z) were perfectly known. A Gaussian mixture model for the n(z) is able to reduce mean-redshift errors whilst preserving the n(z) shape, and thereby yields the most accurate and precise cosmological constraints for any given N × 2 pt configuration in the presence of n(z) biases.
KW - Cosmological parameters
KW - Cosmology: observations
KW - Dark energy
KW - Large-scale structure of Universe
KW - UKRI
KW - EPSRC
KW - EP/Y03015X/1
KW - STFC
KW - ST/V000780/1
KW - ST/Y002652/1
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009835600
U2 - 10.1051/0004-6361/202452466
DO - 10.1051/0004-6361/202452466
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105009835600
SN - 0004-6361
VL - 699
JO - Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF - Astronomy and Astrophysics
M1 - A127
ER -