Abstract
Background: Dementia is a common diagnosis in older people. It is important to identify and record dementia on emergency call-outs, as it impacts on subsequent care decisions. Ambulance services are changing from paper to electronic patient records (EPRs), but there is limited data on how frequently and in which sections of the EPR dementia is being recorded.
Aims: To audit the proportion of ambulance EPRs where dementia is recorded for patients aged (i) 65 and above; (ii) 75 and above, and to describe the sections in the EPR in which dementia is recorded, as there is currently no standardised button or field available to be used.
Results: A total of 314,786 EPRs were included in the audit, over a one year period. The proportion of attended calls with ‘dementia’ recorded in the EPR in patients 65+ was 13.5%, increasing to 16.5% in patients aged 75+, which is similar to that recorded in previous literature. For patients aged 75+ conveyed to hospital, 15.2% had ‘dementia’ recorded in the EPR, which may indicate under-recording. Recording of dementia between Clinical Commissioning Groups varied between 11.0% and 15.3%. Dementia was recorded in 16 different free-text fields, and 38.4% of records had dementia recorded in more than one field.
Conclusion: This audit demonstrates high variability in both the frequency of recording dementia and also the location in the EPR. To ensure consistent recording and ease of retrieval to inform patient care and handover, we propose the EPR should be modified to reflect paramedics’ needs, and those of the healthcare staff who receive and act on the report. Enhanced training for paramedics in the importance and method of recording dementia is required. Future data will enable accurate monitoring of trends in conveyance, and inform justifications for alternative services and novel referral pathways.
Aims: To audit the proportion of ambulance EPRs where dementia is recorded for patients aged (i) 65 and above; (ii) 75 and above, and to describe the sections in the EPR in which dementia is recorded, as there is currently no standardised button or field available to be used.
Results: A total of 314,786 EPRs were included in the audit, over a one year period. The proportion of attended calls with ‘dementia’ recorded in the EPR in patients 65+ was 13.5%, increasing to 16.5% in patients aged 75+, which is similar to that recorded in previous literature. For patients aged 75+ conveyed to hospital, 15.2% had ‘dementia’ recorded in the EPR, which may indicate under-recording. Recording of dementia between Clinical Commissioning Groups varied between 11.0% and 15.3%. Dementia was recorded in 16 different free-text fields, and 38.4% of records had dementia recorded in more than one field.
Conclusion: This audit demonstrates high variability in both the frequency of recording dementia and also the location in the EPR. To ensure consistent recording and ease of retrieval to inform patient care and handover, we propose the EPR should be modified to reflect paramedics’ needs, and those of the healthcare staff who receive and act on the report. Enhanced training for paramedics in the importance and method of recording dementia is required. Future data will enable accurate monitoring of trends in conveyance, and inform justifications for alternative services and novel referral pathways.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 10-18 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | British Paramedic Journal |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- clinical audit
- dementia
- emergency medical services