TY - JOUR
T1 - A dependence of the tidal disruption event rate on global stellar surface mass density and stellar velocity dispersion
AU - Graur, Or
AU - French, K. Decker
AU - Zahid, H. Jabran
AU - Guillochon, James
AU - Mandel, Kaisey S.
AU - Auchettl, Katie
AU - Zabludoff, Ann I.
N1 - Accepted for publication in ApJ
PY - 2018/1/22
Y1 - 2018/1/22
N2 - The rate of tidal disruption events (TDEs), RTDE, is predicted to depend on stellar conditions near the super-massive black hole (SMBH), which are on difficult-to-measure sub-parsec scales. We test whether RTDE depends on kpc-scale global galaxy properties, which are observable. We concentrate on stellar surface mass density, ΣM⋆, and velocity dispersion, σv, which correlate with the stellar density and velocity dispersion of the stars around the SMBH. We consider 35 TDE candidates, with and without known X-ray emission. The hosts range from star-forming to quiescent to quiescent with strong Balmer absorption lines. The last (often with post-starburst spectra) are overrepresented in our sample by a factor of 35+21−17 or 18+8−7, depending on the strength of the Hδ absorption line. For a subsample of hosts with homogeneous measurements, ΣM⋆=109-1010 M⊙/kpc2, higher on average than for a volume-weighted control sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies with similar redshifts and stellar masses. This is because: (1) most of the TDE hosts here are quiescent galaxies, which tend to have higher ΣM⋆ than the star-forming galaxies that dominate the control, and (2) the star-forming hosts have higher average ΣM⋆ than the star-forming control. There is also a weak suggestion that TDE hosts have lower σv than for the quiescent control. Assuming that RTDE∝ΣαM⋆×σβv, and applying a statistical model to the TDE hosts and control sample, we estimate α^=0.9±0.2 and β^=−1.0±0.6. This is broadly consistent with RTDE being tied to the dynamical relaxation of stars surrounding the SMBH.
AB - The rate of tidal disruption events (TDEs), RTDE, is predicted to depend on stellar conditions near the super-massive black hole (SMBH), which are on difficult-to-measure sub-parsec scales. We test whether RTDE depends on kpc-scale global galaxy properties, which are observable. We concentrate on stellar surface mass density, ΣM⋆, and velocity dispersion, σv, which correlate with the stellar density and velocity dispersion of the stars around the SMBH. We consider 35 TDE candidates, with and without known X-ray emission. The hosts range from star-forming to quiescent to quiescent with strong Balmer absorption lines. The last (often with post-starburst spectra) are overrepresented in our sample by a factor of 35+21−17 or 18+8−7, depending on the strength of the Hδ absorption line. For a subsample of hosts with homogeneous measurements, ΣM⋆=109-1010 M⊙/kpc2, higher on average than for a volume-weighted control sample of Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies with similar redshifts and stellar masses. This is because: (1) most of the TDE hosts here are quiescent galaxies, which tend to have higher ΣM⋆ than the star-forming galaxies that dominate the control, and (2) the star-forming hosts have higher average ΣM⋆ than the star-forming control. There is also a weak suggestion that TDE hosts have lower σv than for the quiescent control. Assuming that RTDE∝ΣαM⋆×σβv, and applying a statistical model to the TDE hosts and control sample, we estimate α^=0.9±0.2 and β^=−1.0±0.6. This is broadly consistent with RTDE being tied to the dynamical relaxation of stars surrounding the SMBH.
KW - astro-ph.HE
KW - astro-ph.GA
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fd
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3fd
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 853
JO - The Astrophysical Journal
JF - The Astrophysical Journal
M1 - 39
ER -