A nation dividing? some questions of interpretation

J. Mohan

doi:10.1068/a36308

A nation dividing? some questions of interpretation

J. Mohan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Dorling and Rees's (2003) analysis of intercensal social polarisation is welcome in many respects and I suspect I am not alone in admiring the technical skill involved in such work, not to mention the speed with which the paper was produced! The purpose of this comment is to suggest that this paper should be the starting point for a debate about polarisation, for several reasons.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	365-368
Number of pages	4
Journal	Environment and Planning A
Volume	36
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1068/a36308
Publication status	Published - 2004

Access to Document

10.1068/a36308

Cite this

@article{ee6c734f1fcb4677b20f06873713476a,

title = "A nation dividing? some questions of interpretation",

abstract = "Dorling and Rees's (2003) analysis of intercensal social polarisation is welcome in many respects and I suspect I am not alone in admiring the technical skill involved in such work, not to mention the speed with which the paper was produced! The purpose of this comment is to suggest that this paper should be the starting point for a debate about polarisation, for several reasons.",

author = "J. Mohan",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1068/a36308",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "365--368",

journal = "Environment and Planning A",

issn = "0308-518X",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A nation dividing? some questions of interpretation

AU - Mohan, J.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Dorling and Rees's (2003) analysis of intercensal social polarisation is welcome in many respects and I suspect I am not alone in admiring the technical skill involved in such work, not to mention the speed with which the paper was produced! The purpose of this comment is to suggest that this paper should be the starting point for a debate about polarisation, for several reasons.

AB - Dorling and Rees's (2003) analysis of intercensal social polarisation is welcome in many respects and I suspect I am not alone in admiring the technical skill involved in such work, not to mention the speed with which the paper was produced! The purpose of this comment is to suggest that this paper should be the starting point for a debate about polarisation, for several reasons.

U2 - 10.1068/a36308

DO - 10.1068/a36308

M3 - Article

SN - 0308-518X

VL - 36

SP - 365

EP - 368

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

IS - 2

ER -

A nation dividing? some questions of interpretation

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this