A new Southern Ocean species in the remarkable and rare amphipod family Podosiridae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) questions existing systematic hypotheses

Oliver S. Ashford*, Tammy Horton, Christopher N. Roterman, Michael H. Thurston, Huw J. Griffiths, Angelika Brandt

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The amphipod family Podosiridae is unusual in that it combines morphological elements of the disparate families Podoceridae and Eusiridae. Here, we describe a new species in the family from specimens collected from the Southern Ocean in the vicinity of the South Orkney Islands and South Shetland Islands. We present mitochondrial (COI and 16S) and nuclear (18S) nucleic acid sequences for this and a congeneric species and use these to investigate the phylogenetic placement of Podosiridae within the Amphipoda. Our results do not provide evidence for a close relationship between Podosiridae and Podoceridae or Eusiridae, suggesting that the superficial similarity between these families is the result of morphological convergence. Instead, it is likely that Podosiridae are more closely related to families within Amphilochidira, such as Stenothoidae. Definitive placement of Podosiridae in the Amphipoda awaits further specimen collection, additional nucleotide data (including sequences from the Hyperiopsidae and the Vitjazianidae) and a more directed analysis of relationships within this portion of the amphipod phylogeny.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)613-631
    Number of pages19
    JournalZoological Journal of the Linnean Society
    Volume190
    Issue number2
    Early online date20 Dec 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • Acutocoxae ogilvieae
    • Molecular phylogeny
    • South Orkney Islands

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A new Southern Ocean species in the remarkable and rare amphipod family Podosiridae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) questions existing systematic hypotheses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this