TY - JOUR
T1 - Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host–guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge
AU - Lee, Juyong
AU - Tofoleanu, Florentina
AU - Pickard, Frank C.
AU - König, Gerhard
AU - Huang, Jing
AU - Damjanović, Ana
AU - Baek, Minkyung
AU - Seok, Chaok
AU - Brooks, Bernard R.
N1 - Authored in non-UK institution
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Herein, we report the absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Initial conformations of CBClip complexes were obtained using docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Free energy calculations were performed using thermodynamic integration (TI) with soft-core potentials and Bennett’s acceptance ratio (BAR) method based on a serial insertion scheme. We compared the results obtained with TI simulations with soft-core potentials and Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations with the serial insertion method combined with the BAR method. The results show that the difference between the two methods can be mainly attributed to the van der Waals free energies, suggesting that either the simulations used for TI or the simulations used for BAR, or both are not fully converged and the two sets of simulations may have sampled difference phase space regions. The penalty scores of force field parameters of the 10 guest molecules provided by CHARMM Generalized Force Field can be an indicator of the accuracy of binding free energy calculations. Among our submissions, the combination of docking and TI performed best, which yielded the root mean square deviation of 2.94 kcal/mol and an average unsigned error of 3.41 kcal/mol for the ten guest molecules. These values were best overall among all participants. However, our submissions had little correlation with experiments.
AB - Herein, we report the absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Initial conformations of CBClip complexes were obtained using docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Free energy calculations were performed using thermodynamic integration (TI) with soft-core potentials and Bennett’s acceptance ratio (BAR) method based on a serial insertion scheme. We compared the results obtained with TI simulations with soft-core potentials and Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations with the serial insertion method combined with the BAR method. The results show that the difference between the two methods can be mainly attributed to the van der Waals free energies, suggesting that either the simulations used for TI or the simulations used for BAR, or both are not fully converged and the two sets of simulations may have sampled difference phase space regions. The penalty scores of force field parameters of the 10 guest molecules provided by CHARMM Generalized Force Field can be an indicator of the accuracy of binding free energy calculations. Among our submissions, the combination of docking and TI performed best, which yielded the root mean square deviation of 2.94 kcal/mol and an average unsigned error of 3.41 kcal/mol for the ten guest molecules. These values were best overall among all participants. However, our submissions had little correlation with experiments.
KW - Absolute binding free energy calculation
KW - Bennett’s acceptance ratio
KW - Constant-pH simulation
KW - Double decoupling scheme
KW - Hamiltonian replica exchange
KW - Host-guest complexes
KW - Thermodynamic integration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988728222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10822-016-9968-2
DO - 10.1007/s10822-016-9968-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 27677749
AN - SCOPUS:84988728222
SN - 0920-654X
VL - 31
SP - 71
EP - 85
JO - Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
JF - Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
IS - 1
ER -