Across the stolen ponds: the political geography of social welfare in rural Eastern India

Ritanjan Das, Subhasish Dey, Ranjita Neogi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Despite a strong state and a slew of poverty reduction/welfare programmes, the provision of basic services to the rural poor in India remains puzzlingly inadequate. Moving away from the usual trend of aggregate welfare impact analysis that characterises most studies on this theme, we explore the on-ground distributive politics around the implementation of India’s flagship social welfare programme, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS). Based on a mixed-method study in the state of West Bengal, using observational primary data and ethnographic material across 46 sample village councils (gram panchayats) from 2013 to 2018, we draw attention to the non-homogeneity in the way political incentives of welfare provision are orientated towards different parties and individual stakeholders. In doing so, we traverse across multiple domains of political economic concepts, particularly that of partisan alignment, clientelism and patronage, and unpack the differentiated constellation of localised political incentives founded on a unique form of transactional paradigm called settings. We show how these on-ground transactions provide a multitude of political incentives for ruling/opposition political parties and panchayat functionaries, often going beyond conventional ethno-favouritism ideas of patronage and assuming a more personalised context. In turn, we also argue that the idea of settings is useful in providing a deeper understanding of local state-society relations and the political geography of welfare provisions in rural eastern India.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWorld Development
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 22 Apr 2021


  • settings
  • partisan alignment
  • clientelism
  • panchayat
  • West Bengal


Dive into the research topics of 'Across the stolen ponds: the political geography of social welfare in rural Eastern India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this