Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery

P. Tejedor, F. Sagias, D. Nock, K. Flashman, S. Naqvi, N. Li Kandala, Jim. S. Khan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To compare short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) after the use of robotic and laparoscopic staplers. Over a 5-year period, 196 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the use of laparoscopic (LS) or robotic stapler (RS). Patient demographics and postoperative complications were compared. A total of 145 (74%) robotic TME were performed using the LS and 51 (26%) the RS. No conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy were observed, in either group. Transection of the rectum using one or two firings was achieved in a higher proportion of RS cases (91%) compared with LS cases (60%; p < 0.001). The anastomotic leakage (AL) rate was 4% in the RS group vs. 7% in the LS group (p > 0.05). However, when three or more firings were needed for the rectal transection, the risk of AL increased (3.4% with ≤ 2 firings vs. 10.7% with ≥ 3 firings, p = 0.006). Our data confirm that multiple stapler firings for rectal transection have a major impact on AL. The robotic stapler simplifies the transaction, so that rectal division requires fewer stapler firings, with a potential reduction in the incidence of AL.
Original languageEnglish
Article number0
Pages (from-to)365-370
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume14
Early online date9 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this