Aesthetic appreciation and Spanish art: insights from eye-tracking

Claire Stephanie Bailey-Ross, Andrew Beresford, Daniel Smith, Claire Warwick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    138 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Eye-tracking—the process of capturing and measuring human eye movement—is becoming an increasingly prevalent tool in the cultural heritage sector to understand visual processing and audience behaviours. Yet, most applications to date have focused on individual artworks and distinctions between representative/non-representative topics, with little prior work on the effects of differing written interpretations on the visual exploration of collections of artworks, particularly with devotional themes. This article reports on an eye-tracking study that explored responses to the unique collection of Francisco de Zurbarán paintings in County Durham. Using eye-tracking technology in a laboratory setting, we evaluated the viewing behaviour of three participant groups to determine whether the accompanying written context influences how digital reproductions are experienced. In addition to demonstrating statistically significant variations in aesthetic appreciation, the experiments showed that the gaze can be redirected towards areas of conceptual significance. Most importantly, we were able to challenge the assumption that viewers always look at faces (Bindemann et al., 2005). Our findings make an important new contribution to the scholarly understanding of how audiences view, appreciate, and understand artworks and to museum and heritage practices relevant to the display of art.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number0
    Pages (from-to)i17-i35
    Number of pages19
    JournalDigital Scholarship in the Humanities
    Volume34
    Issue number1
    Early online date31 Jul 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusEarly online - 31 Jul 2019

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aesthetic appreciation and Spanish art: insights from eye-tracking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this