Age discrimination, the default retirement age and occupational pensions: Experiences from Canada and predictions for Britain

Michael Connolly, Orla Gough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

On 1st October 2006, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 come into force. Expectations of older workers will be dampened however with the inclusion of a “default retirement age”, entitling employers to retire workers aged 65 or over, without justification. A major reason given for this exemption is to preserve the stability of occupational pension schemes. In Canada, a challenge to a similar retirement exemption failed in the Supreme Court. The reason was based, in part, on the need to preserve the stability of pensions. This paper argues that the Canadian experience can be distinguished and that default retirement age in the British legislation is questionable under European law and is not necessary to preserve the stability of pension schemes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalWeb Journal of Current Legal Issues
Volume2007
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age discrimination, the default retirement age and occupational pensions: Experiences from Canada and predictions for Britain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this