Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An environmentally sustainable feasible policy for dynamic lot sizing model with remanufacturing and separate setup costs: time complexity and optimality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We consider a dynamic lot sizing model in which end products to satisfy demands are obtained by remanufacturing m core types of differing quality, where m ≥ 1, or manufacturing from raw materials. In the model, we have separate setup costs associated with manufacturing and remanufacturing. As is widely known, remanufacturing is an environmental preferable choice compared with manufacturing. In view of this, we design a feasible policy for our model that prioritizes remanufacturing over manufacturing. This feasible policy can be found in polynomial time. We argue that the policy does not lead to high total system cost by first analytically showing desirable properties of the policy compared to the optimal policy in total system cost under a reasonable assumption on returns as cores. Then, we consider instances of the model, and numerically compare the cost under the feasible policy with the optimal cost. We also provide numerical results on the speed at which the feasible policy can be found using these instances.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages34
JournalInternational Journal of Production Research
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 11 Aug 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Dynamic lot sizing
  • Remanufacturing
  • Inventory and production policies
  • Dynamic programming
  • Time complexity
  • Environmental sustainability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An environmentally sustainable feasible policy for dynamic lot sizing model with remanufacturing and separate setup costs: time complexity and optimality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this