An examination of the Self‐Administered Interview (SAI ) as a verbal veracity assessment tool

Charlotte A. Hudson, Aldert Vrij, Lucy Akehurst, Lorraine Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Self‐Administered Interview (SAI) is a written eyewitness recall tool that elicits more information from cooperative witnesses than written free recall (WFR) formats. To date, SAI research has examined the accounts of cooperative people providing honest reports. In the current experiment, truthful and fabricating participants (N = 128) either completed a WFR or a SAI after witnessing a crime (initial account). After a one‐week delay, participants were interviewed verbally (subsequent interview). Truth tellers reported significantly more detail than liars in both the initial account and subsequent interview, and participants who completed the SAI reported more detail than those completing the WFR. Truth tellers repeated and omitted more information in the subsequent interview than liars, however, there was no significant difference in the number of reminiscent details reported. Although the SAI is effective in eliciting information as an initial eyewitness reporting tool, no benefits for the detection of deception were demonstrated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1091
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume34
Issue number5
Early online date25 May 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2020

Keywords

  • deception
  • self-administered interview
  • consistency
  • witness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An examination of the Self‐Administered Interview (SAI ) as a verbal veracity assessment tool'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this