Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats

Sohail Safdar; Mohd Fadzil Hassan

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32

Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats

Sohail Safdar^*, Mohd Fadzil Hassan

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Computing

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

The main objective of the research is to conduct an analysis of the framework for alternate execution of workflows under intrusion threat with respect to different types of threats. Framework for alternate execution of workflows under threat makes the system available to the end user no matter if it is under attack by some intrusion threat. The assessment is required to be made for the framework in consideration in terms of what types of threats and how many types of threats for which it may work. For this purpose, 34 different types of threats as described by SOPHOS have been considered. Firstly the types of threats have been categorized based on their goals. Then for each category, framework in consideration is assessed. On the basis of that assessment it is analyzed for what types of threats, the framework can be enabled completely and partially. The number of threats for which the framework is enabled completely is also found. Based on the analysis, the recommendations have been made for possible extensions in the framework where it is enabled partially.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings
Editors	Jasni Mohamad Zain, Wan Maseri bt Wan Mohd, Eyas El-Qawasmeh
Publisher	Springer
Pages	361-375
Number of pages	15
Volume	Part 2
ISBN (Electronic)	9783642221910
ISBN (Print)	9783642221903
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0
Publication status	Published - 27 Jun 2011
Event	2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2011 - Kuantan, Malaysia Duration: 27 Jun 2011 → 29 Jun 2011

Publication series

Name	Communications in Computer and Information Science
Volume	180
ISSN (Print)	1865-0929
ISSN (Electronic)	1865-0937

Conference

Conference	2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2011
Country/Territory	Malaysia
City	Kuantan
Period	27/06/11 → 29/06/11

Keywords

alternate execution
data hibernation
SOPHOS
workflows

Access to Document

Cite this

Safdar, S., & Hassan, M. F. (2011). Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats. In J. M. Zain, W. M. B. Wan Mohd, & E. El-Qawasmeh (Eds.), Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings (Vol. Part 2, pp. 361-375). (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 180). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0

Safdar, Sohail ; Hassan, Mohd Fadzil. / Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats. Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings. editor / Jasni Mohamad Zain ; Wan Maseri bt Wan Mohd ; Eyas El-Qawasmeh. Vol. Part 2 Springer, 2011. pp. 361-375 (Communications in Computer and Information Science).

@inproceedings{9eb92235f4484157b57e14a4fc9ef80a,

title = "Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats",

abstract = "The main objective of the research is to conduct an analysis of the framework for alternate execution of workflows under intrusion threat with respect to different types of threats. Framework for alternate execution of workflows under threat makes the system available to the end user no matter if it is under attack by some intrusion threat. The assessment is required to be made for the framework in consideration in terms of what types of threats and how many types of threats for which it may work. For this purpose, 34 different types of threats as described by SOPHOS have been considered. Firstly the types of threats have been categorized based on their goals. Then for each category, framework in consideration is assessed. On the basis of that assessment it is analyzed for what types of threats, the framework can be enabled completely and partially. The number of threats for which the framework is enabled completely is also found. Based on the analysis, the recommendations have been made for possible extensions in the framework where it is enabled partially.",

keywords = "alternate execution, data hibernation, SOPHOS, workflows",

author = "Sohail Safdar and Hassan, \{Mohd Fadzil\}",

year = "2011",

month = jun,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0\_32",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783642221903",

volume = "Part 2",

series = "Communications in Computer and Information Science",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "361--375",

editor = "Zain, \{Jasni Mohamad\} and \{Wan Mohd\}, \{Wan Maseri bt\} and Eyas El-Qawasmeh",

booktitle = "Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings",

address = "Netherlands",

note = "2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2011 ; Conference date: 27-06-2011 Through 29-06-2011",

}

Safdar, S & Hassan, MF 2011, Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats. in JM Zain, WMB Wan Mohd & E El-Qawasmeh (eds), Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings. vol. Part 2, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 180, Springer, pp. 361-375, 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2011, Kuantan, Malaysia, 27/06/11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0

Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats. / Safdar, Sohail; Hassan, Mohd Fadzil.
Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings. ed. / Jasni Mohamad Zain; Wan Maseri bt Wan Mohd; Eyas El-Qawasmeh. Vol. Part 2 Springer, 2011. p. 361-375 (Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 180).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats

AU - Safdar, Sohail

AU - Hassan, Mohd Fadzil

PY - 2011/6/27

Y1 - 2011/6/27

N2 - The main objective of the research is to conduct an analysis of the framework for alternate execution of workflows under intrusion threat with respect to different types of threats. Framework for alternate execution of workflows under threat makes the system available to the end user no matter if it is under attack by some intrusion threat. The assessment is required to be made for the framework in consideration in terms of what types of threats and how many types of threats for which it may work. For this purpose, 34 different types of threats as described by SOPHOS have been considered. Firstly the types of threats have been categorized based on their goals. Then for each category, framework in consideration is assessed. On the basis of that assessment it is analyzed for what types of threats, the framework can be enabled completely and partially. The number of threats for which the framework is enabled completely is also found. Based on the analysis, the recommendations have been made for possible extensions in the framework where it is enabled partially.

AB - The main objective of the research is to conduct an analysis of the framework for alternate execution of workflows under intrusion threat with respect to different types of threats. Framework for alternate execution of workflows under threat makes the system available to the end user no matter if it is under attack by some intrusion threat. The assessment is required to be made for the framework in consideration in terms of what types of threats and how many types of threats for which it may work. For this purpose, 34 different types of threats as described by SOPHOS have been considered. Firstly the types of threats have been categorized based on their goals. Then for each category, framework in consideration is assessed. On the basis of that assessment it is analyzed for what types of threats, the framework can be enabled completely and partially. The number of threats for which the framework is enabled completely is also found. Based on the analysis, the recommendations have been made for possible extensions in the framework where it is enabled partially.

KW - alternate execution

KW - data hibernation

KW - SOPHOS

KW - workflows

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79960343836

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:79960343836

SN - 9783642221903

VL - Part 2

T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science

SP - 361

EP - 375

BT - Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings

A2 - Zain, Jasni Mohamad

A2 - Wan Mohd, Wan Maseri bt

A2 - El-Qawasmeh, Eyas

PB - Springer

T2 - 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems, ICSECS 2011

Y2 - 27 June 2011 through 29 June 2011

ER -

Safdar S, Hassan MF. Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats. In Zain JM, Wan Mohd WMB, El-Qawasmeh E, editors, Software Engineering and Computer Systems - Second International Conference, ICSECS 2011, Proceedings. Vol. Part 2. Springer. 2011. p. 361-375. (Communications in Computer and Information Science). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0_32, 10.1007/978-3-642-22191-0

Analyzing framework for alternate execution of workflows for different types of intrusion threats

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this