Applied sport psychology consultant perceptions of the usefulness and impacts of performance profiling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite the apparent widespread use of Butler and Hardy's (1992) performance profiling procedure (Doyle & Parfitt, 1999), there is limited research detailing the benefits that can accrue from its use. Hence, the present investigation sought to provide an evaluation of sport psychologists' perceptions of the usefulness and impacts of performance profiling. Fifty-six British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences accredited sport psychologists completed a closed survey detailing their perceptions of the usefulness and benefits associated with the production of an individual athlete performance profile within a group setting. Descriptive analysis revealed that consultants believed profiling to be useful in providing a basis for goal setting, identifying strengths and weaknesses, raising athlete awareness, evaluating and monitoring athlete performance, and in facilitating discussion, communication and interaction within teams.This brief report argues that further research is needed to empirically evaluate the usefulness of profiling in order that its frequent use can be fully justified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)360-368
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Psychology
Volume41
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applied sport psychology consultant perceptions of the usefulness and impacts of performance profiling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this