Are senior nurses on Clinical Commissioning Groups in England inadvertently supporting the devaluation of their profession? A study of the literature

Helen Allan*, Roz Dixon, Gay Lee, Mike O'Driscoll, Jan Savage, Christine Tapson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this study, we discuss the role of senior nurses who sit on clinical commissioning groups that now plan and procure most health services in England. These nurses are expected to bring a nursing view to all aspects of clinical commissioning group business. The role is a senior level appointment and requires experience of strategic commissioning. However, little is known about how nurses function in these roles. Following Barrientos' methodology, published policy and literature were analysed to investigate these roles and National Health Service England's claim that nursing can influence and advance a nursing perspective in clinical commissioning groups. Drawing on work by Berg, Barry and Chandler on 'new public management', we discuss how nurses on clinical commissioning groups work at the alignment of the interests of biomedicine and managerialism. We propose that the way this nursing role is being implemented might paradoxically offer further evidence of the devaluing of nursing rather than the emergence of a strong professional nursing voice at the level of strategic commissioning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-187
Number of pages9
JournalNursing Inquiry
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date1 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are senior nurses on Clinical Commissioning Groups in England inadvertently supporting the devaluation of their profession? A study of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this