Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method

Hadi Badri Ahmadi, Simonov Kusi-Sarpong, Jafar Rezaei

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3351 Downloads (Pure)


    A truly sustainable organization needs to take the economic, environmental and social dimensions of sustainability into account. Although the economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability have been examined by many scholars and practitioners, thus far, the social dimension has been received less attention in literature and in practice, in particular in developing countries. Social sustainability enables other sustainability initiatives and overlooking this dimension can have a serious adverse impact across supply chains. To address this issue, this study proposes a framework for investigating the social sustainability of supply chains in manufacturing companies. To show the applicability and efficiency of the proposed framework, a sample of 38 experts was used to evaluate and prioritize social sustainability criteria, using a multi-criteria decision-making method called the ‘best worst method’ (BWM). The criteria are ranked according to their average weight obtained through BWM. The respondents view ‘contractual stakeholders influence’ as the most important social sustainability criterion. The results of this study help industry managers, decision-makers and practitioners decide where to focus their attention during the implementation stage, to increase social sustainability in their organizational supply chain and move towards sustainable development.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)99-106
    JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
    Early online date29 Jul 2017
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017


    • Sustainable supply chain management
    • Social sustainability
    • Best worst method
    • BWM


    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this