Beyond the distinction between word-cued versus important autobiographical memories: a reply

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	90-92
Journal	Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume	4
Issue number	1
Early online date	30 Jan 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.002
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2015
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

@article{8ac8ce830e164a718cd756712fc2db7c,

title = "Beyond the distinction between word-cued versus important autobiographical memories: a reply",

author = "Jonathan Koppel and Dorthe Berntsen",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.002",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "90--92",

journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",

issn = "2211-3681",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the distinction between word-cued versus important autobiographical memories

T2 - a reply

AU - Koppel, Jonathan

AU - Berntsen, Dorthe

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.01.002

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 2211-3681

VL - 4

SP - 90

EP - 92

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

IS - 1

ER -