Bringing the state back into the sociology of nationalism: the persona ficta is political

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    64 Downloads (Pure)


    This article re-examines two key questions from the sociology of nationalism – why nationalism resonates emotionally and to what extent nations are socially salient – and the implications of these for a sense of peoplehood and collective political agency. The particular focus is on the state. Instead of conflating statehood with nationhood, or seeking to expose it as illusory, sociologists should consider how the state – imagined and experienced as a permanent, transhistorical fixture structuring public power and authority – has crucial conditioning effects on society and politics. It will be posited that statehood is a more useful concept than nationhood for explaining the resonance and salience ascribed to nationalism and nations. Whether we favour reinvigorating or abolishing nationalism, the implications of this argument are profound, with contemporary cosmopolitan sociology in particular suffering analytically and prescriptively from a failure to recognise its tacit methodological statism.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1088-1104
    Number of pages17
    Issue number6
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020


    • banal nationalism
    • cosmopolitanism
    • nationalism
    • post-colonialism
    • the state


    Dive into the research topics of 'Bringing the state back into the sociology of nationalism: the persona ficta is political'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this