Britain, Europe, and Diefenbaker's trade diversion proposals, 1957-1958

Tim Rooth

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

    Abstract

    On the eve of the Progressive Conservative election victory in 1957 there was nothing in the 'low politics' of trade and monetary relations between Canada and the United Kingdom to match the dramatic impact of the Suez Crisis on the broader relationship between the two countries. But although economic relations had not been subject to any such shock, Canada's economic links with the United Kingdom had been subject to prolonged erosion and were completely overshadowed by those between Canada and the United States. British exports to Canada, despite preferential treatment, had struggled in the postwar years. Although they had risen sharply between 1955 and 1956, they still accounted for only 8.5 percent of total Canadian imports in those years. This was approximately half the prewar share, still well below the level of the late 1940s, and dwarfed by imports from the United States, which accounted for 73 percent of the market. Britain was Canada's second most important customer, but a long way behind the United States, which had steadily grown in absolute and relative importance in the decade after the Second World War. Canadian exports to the United Kingdom constantly disappointed Ottawa, and an edge to Canadian frustration was provided by the persistence of dollar rationing and import licencing by Britain, which hampered Canadian sales. The Americans dominated inward investment.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCanada and the end of empire
    EditorsP. Buckner
    Place of PublicationVancouver, Canada
    PublisherUBC Press
    Pages117-132
    Number of pages16
    ISBN (Print)0774809159
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Britain, Europe, and Diefenbaker's trade diversion proposals, 1957-1958'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this