TY - JOUR
T1 - Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations
T2 - an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge
AU - König, Gerhard
AU - Pickard, Frank C.
AU - Huang, Jing
AU - Simmonett, Andrew C.
AU - Tofoleanu, Florentina
AU - Lee, Juyong
AU - Dral, Pavlo O.
AU - Prasad, Samarjeet
AU - Jones, Michael
AU - Shao, Yihan
AU - Thiel, Walter
AU - Brooks, Bernard R.
N1 - authored in non-UK institution
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - One of the central aspects of biomolecular recognition is the hydrophobic effect, which is experimentally evaluated by measuring the distribution coefficients of compounds between polar and apolar phases. We use our predictions of the distribution coefficients between water and cyclohexane from the SAMPL5 challenge to estimate the hydrophobicity of different explicit solvent simulation techniques. Based on molecular dynamics trajectories with the CHARMM General Force Field, we compare pure molecular mechanics (MM) with quantum-mechanical (QM) calculations based on QM/MM schemes that treat the solvent at the MM level. We perform QM/MM with both density functional theory (BLYP) and semi-empirical methods (OM1, OM2, OM3, PM3). The calculations also serve to test the sensitivity of partition coefficients to solute polarizability as well as the interplay of the quantum-mechanical region with the fixed-charge molecular mechanics environment. Our results indicate that QM/MM with both BLYP and OM2 outperforms pure MM. However, this observation is limited to a subset of cases where convergence of the free energy can be achieved.
AB - One of the central aspects of biomolecular recognition is the hydrophobic effect, which is experimentally evaluated by measuring the distribution coefficients of compounds between polar and apolar phases. We use our predictions of the distribution coefficients between water and cyclohexane from the SAMPL5 challenge to estimate the hydrophobicity of different explicit solvent simulation techniques. Based on molecular dynamics trajectories with the CHARMM General Force Field, we compare pure molecular mechanics (MM) with quantum-mechanical (QM) calculations based on QM/MM schemes that treat the solvent at the MM level. We perform QM/MM with both density functional theory (BLYP) and semi-empirical methods (OM1, OM2, OM3, PM3). The calculations also serve to test the sensitivity of partition coefficients to solute polarizability as well as the interplay of the quantum-mechanical region with the fixed-charge molecular mechanics environment. Our results indicate that QM/MM with both BLYP and OM2 outperforms pure MM. However, this observation is limited to a subset of cases where convergence of the free energy can be achieved.
KW - Cyclohexane
KW - Distribution coefficient
KW - Explicit solvent
KW - Multi-scale free energy simulations
KW - Partition coefficient
KW - Water
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984820594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10822-016-9936-x
DO - 10.1007/s10822-016-9936-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 27577746
AN - SCOPUS:84984820594
SN - 0920-654X
VL - 30
SP - 989
EP - 1006
JO - Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
JF - Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
IS - 11
ER -