Can optical coherence tomography predict the outcome of laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema?

Elizabeth J. Estabrook, Krishnappa C. Madhusudhana, Shabeeba R. Hannan, Richard S. B. Newsom

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background and objective: To assess the outcome of laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic macular edema.

    Patients and methods: Forty-seven patients (51 eyes) with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) undergoing grid laser photocoagulation were included. Clinical examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at baseline and 3 to 4 months after treatment. The central foveal thickness, mean inner macular thickness (average retinal thickness in fovea and inner macular circle), and mean macular thickness were calculated. Based on the greatest OCT thickness at baseline, patients were grouped according to mild (< 300 µm; Group 1), moderate (300 to 399 µm; Group 2), and severe (> 400 µm; Group 3) macular edema.

    Results: Group 2 showed significant reductions in central foveal thickness (23 µm, P = .02), mean inner macular thickness (18 µm, P = .02), and mean macular thickness (9 µm, P = .04) with slight improvement in visual acuity. Groups 1 and 3 did not show any significant change in macular thickness values and there was a statistically insignificant worsening of visual acuity in these groups.

    Conclusions: Patients with moderate macular thickening of 300 to 400 µm benefit most from laser treatment. OCT may help in choosing the appropriate treatment for CSME based on the degree of macular thickening. Long-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)478-483
    JournalOphthalmic Surgery, Lasers, and Imaging
    Volume38
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Can optical coherence tomography predict the outcome of laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this