Abstract
A discrepancy between tourists' intentions and behaviour threatens the effectiveness of interventions to favour sustainable choices. To reduce the gap between intentions and behaviour, one should consider both the consumer's and the researcher's shortcomings. On the one hand, consumers amplify the discrepancy between their sayings and doings through their hypocritical behaviour. On the other hand, researchers often aggravate the intention-behaviour gap because of their methodological myopia (e.g., by focusing on non-behavioural outcomes, or by working with unrealistic research settings). This paper offers some specific recommendations to address consumer hypocrisy. We also provide researchers with some methodological advice on how to minimise possible biases by i) defining ambitious research goals, ii) mitigating the researcher's invasiveness, and iii) adopting strong behavioural measures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103678 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Annals of Tourism Research |
| Early online date | 12 Jan 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Early online - 12 Jan 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Intention-behaviour gap
- Sustainable tourism
- Consumer hypocrisy
- Experimental realism
- Tourist behaviour
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consumer hypocrisy and researcher myopia: a scrutiny of the intention-behaviour gap in sustainable tourism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver