Countering fraud for competitive advantage

Mark Button, J. Gee

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Substantially reduce the largely hidden cost of fraud, and rea a new competitive advantage. As the title suggests, Countering Fraud for Competitive Advantage presents a compelling business case for investing in anti-fraud measures to counter financial crime. It looks at the ways of reaping a new competitive advantage by substantially reducing the hidden cost of fraud. Aimed at a wide business community and based on solid research, it is the only book to put forward an evidence-based model for combating corporate fraud and financial crime. Despite its increase and capture of the news headlines, corporate fraud is largely ignored by most organizations. Fraud is responsible for losses of up to nine percent of revenues--sometimes more. Yet, most organizations don't believe they have a problem and don't always measure fraud losses. This highlights an area for capturing a competitive advantage--with the right counter-fraud strategy, massive losses due to the cost of fraud can be reduced for a fraction of the return. Advocates a new model for tackling fraud and illustrates theories with best practice examples from around the world The authors have close links with the Counter Fraud Professional Accreditation Board: Jim Gee is a world-renowned expert in the field, with a high profile in professional bodies such as the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Mark Button is Director of the leading Centre for Counter Fraud Studies, Portsmouth University, U.K. Organizations are losing millions of dollars to fraud. This book outlines a comprehensive approach to reducing financial crime and helping return some of the revenue lost to the cost of fraud.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationChichester
PublisherWiley
Number of pages202
ISBN (Print)9781119994749
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Countering fraud for competitive advantage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this