Cross-strait marriages and immigration policies

Isabelle Cheng*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter examines how the Taiwanese government regulates and integrates the feminised Chinese marriage migration in the citizenship legislation. Seeing Chinese female spouses as citizens, Taiwan actively scrutinises their request for settlement for the interests of public safety, national security, and expelling the hypocrisy of the un-recognised sovereignty of Taiwan. Regarding the making of immigration legislation as an integral part of democratisation, this chapter points out that household registration is utilised as an institution with which to stress the desired territorial link between Chinese migrants and the host society for their integration into the political community of Taiwan. Seeing Chinese female spouses as wives-mothers, this chapter shows that the legislation is gendered in a way which recognises the critical advantages of the care they provide for the family as well as the society. However, a close examination of the cross-strait couples’ strategies of rights-claim movement shows that the gendering of the legislation is inter-subjectively constructed by the couples and the state. At times, framing them along the gender bias serves the interest of the couples as a whole, and the Chinese wives themselves, in certain circumstances.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan
    EditorsGunter Schubert
    PublisherRoutledge
    Pages446-462
    Number of pages16
    ISBN (Electronic)9781315769523
    ISBN (Print)9781138781870, 9780367581619
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

    Keywords

    • marriage migration
    • organised hypocrisy
    • sovereignty
    • integration
    • household registration
    • citizenship legislation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-strait marriages and immigration policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this