Cultural differences in the efficacy of unexpected questions, sketching, and timeline methods in eliciting cues to deception

Irina Tache, Lara Warmelink, Paul Taylor, Lorraine Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Asking unexpected questions, asking the interviewee to sketch the room, and asking the interviewee to make a timeline are techniques that have been shown to help an interviewer detect deceit. However, evidence of the efficacy of these techniques comes from studies of North American and North-West European participants, who are on average more individualistic (i.e., value individual achievements and uniqueness over group achievements) than people from other parts of the world. In two experiments involving participants with individualistic and collectivistic cultural backgrounds, we provide a more culturally diverse test of these techniques. Specifically, this study describes two experiments that investigated these interviewing techniques with people who are recent migrants to the UK. Experiment 1 used the LIWC categories “I,” “we,” “cognitive processes,” and “social processes” as the dependent variables; Experiment 2 measured details provided in a sketch and a timeline. The results show no effects of veracity in either of these experiments, although various effects of cultural differences in the outcome variables were observed. This suggests that cues to deception may not necessarily generalize to people from different cultural backgrounds. These results highlight the importance of conducting lie detection research across different countries and cultures.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1175333
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2023

Keywords

  • deception
  • cultural differences
  • individualism and collectivism
  • deception cues
  • LIWC

Cite this