Abstract
The issue of damages or compensation for breach of contract and for that matter expropriation or nationalisation in international investment law still remains as enigmatic as ever. Even a cursory glance at international arbitral awards concerning the issue gives such an impression. The presence of stabilisation clauses in a contract is considered to be one of the elements of assessment of compensation for the aggrieved party. It is not clear how the stabilisation clauses concerned in the contract played a role in the quantum of compensation awarded by various arbitral tribunals. There appears no consistency in the arbitral decision-making process across the board on the issue. The paper attempts to appraise the concerned issues.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 246-251 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | International Energy Law & Taxation Review |
| Volume | 11/12 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Damages for breach of stabilisation clauses in international investment law: where do we stand today?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver