Determining the porous structure for optimal soft-tissue ingrowth: an in vivo histological study

Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon, Robert Dowling, Catherine Pendegrass, Gordon Blunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The success of osseointegrated transcutaneous prostheses depends on a soft-tissue seal forming at the skin-implant interface in order to prevent infection. Current designs include a flange with drilled holes or a subdermal barrier with a porous coating in an attempt to promote soft-tissue attachment. However, the soft-tissue seal is not reliably achieved despite these designs and infection remains a significant problem. This study investigated soft-tissue integration into fully porous titanium alloy structures with interconnected pores. The study aimed to determine the effect of altering pore and strut size combinations on soft-tissue ingrowth into porous titanium alloy structures in vivo. It was hypothesized that implants with a more open porous structure with larger pore sizes would increase soft-tissue ingrowth more than less open porous structures. Porous titanium alloy cylinders were inserted into sheep paparaspinal muscles (n = 6) and left in situ for four weeks. A histological assessment of soft-tissue ingrowth was performed. Percentage soft-tissue pore fill, cell nuclei density and blood vessel density were quantified. The results showed that larger pore sizes were supportive of soft-tissue ingrowth. A structure with a pore size of 700μm and a strut size of 300μm supported revascularisation to the greatest degree. A flange with this structure may be used in future studies of osseointegrated transcutaneous prostheses in order to enhance the soft-tissue seal.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0206228
Number of pages17
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determining the porous structure for optimal soft-tissue ingrowth: an in vivo histological study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this