Developing Britain’s port infrastructure: markets, location and policy

Mike Asteris, Alan Collins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    The authors draw on historical evidence, recent public inquiry documentation and maritime port-capacity forecasts to examine the logic and consistency of British seaport infrastructure development. In light of the rejection of the Dibden Bay (Southampton) container-port proposal, the authors counterpoint the UK government position with the views and evidence presented by key players in the port and shipping industry. The respective standpoints are shown to be markedly divergent in a number of key respects. The principal conclusion is that market forces are of critical importance in determining the nature and location of port developments. Consequently, unless shippers are provided with sufficiently flexible facilities in the locations they prefer, Britain could, as in the 1980s, find itself in danger of becoming little more than an appendage to the major North European continental ports. The delicate balance between interventionist and market-led port development is an issue that will inevitably be encountered in other geographical contexts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2271-2286
    Number of pages16
    JournalEnvironment and Planning A
    Issue number9
    Publication statusPublished - 2007


    Dive into the research topics of 'Developing Britain’s port infrastructure: markets, location and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this