Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool

Valerio Celentano; Neil Smart; Ronan A. Cahill; Antonino Spinelli; Mariano Cesare Giglio; John McGrath; Andreas Obermair; Gianluca Pellino; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Pawanindra Lal; Laura Lorenzon; Nicola De Angelis; Luigi Boni; Sharmila Gupta; John P. Griffith; Austin G. Acheson; Tom D. Cecil; Mark G. Coleman

doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool

Valerio Celentano, Neil Smart, Ronan A. Cahill, Antonino Spinelli, Mariano Cesare Giglio, John McGrath, Andreas Obermair, Gianluca Pellino, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Pawanindra Lal, Laura Lorenzon, Nicola De Angelis, Luigi Boni, Sharmila Gupta, John P. Griffith, Austin G. Acheson, Tom D. Cecil, Mark G. Coleman

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

136 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool.

Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development.

Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability.

Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs.

Original language	English
Number of pages	8
Journal	Surgical Endoscopy
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4
Publication status	Published - 6 Apr 2020

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery
Video assessment tool
Guidelines
Minimally invasive surgery
Surgical training

Access to Document

10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

Development and validation of a recommended checklistFinal published version, 901 KBLicence: CC BY

http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

Cite this

Celentano, V., Smart, N., Cahill, R. A., Spinelli, A., Giglio, M. C., McGrath, J., Obermair, A., Pellino, G., Hasegawa, H., Lal, P., Lorenzon, L., De Angelis, N., Boni, L., Gupta, S., Griffith, J. P., Acheson, A. G., Cecil, T. D., & Coleman, M. G. (2020). Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

@article{8c75b41913ce4e05b15ecfc97fbe941e,

title = "Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool",

abstract = "Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs.",

keywords = "Laparoscopic surgery, Video assessment tool, Guidelines, Minimally invasive surgery, Surgical training",

author = "Valerio Celentano and Neil Smart and Cahill, {Ronan A.} and Antonino Spinelli and Giglio, {Mariano Cesare} and John McGrath and Andreas Obermair and Gianluca Pellino and Hirotoshi Hasegawa and Pawanindra Lal and Laura Lorenzon and {De Angelis}, Nicola and Luigi Boni and Sharmila Gupta and Griffith, {John P.} and Acheson, {Austin G.} and Cecil, {Tom D.} and Coleman, {Mark G.}",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4",

language = "English",

journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",

issn = "0930-2794",

publisher = "Springer New York",

}

Celentano, V, Smart, N, Cahill, RA, Spinelli, A, Giglio, MC, McGrath, J, Obermair, A, Pellino, G, Hasegawa, H, Lal, P, Lorenzon, L, De Angelis, N, Boni, L, Gupta, S, Griffith, JP, Acheson, AG, Cecil, TD & Coleman, MG 2020, 'Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool', Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool

AU - Celentano, Valerio

AU - Smart, Neil

AU - Cahill, Ronan A.

AU - Spinelli, Antonino

AU - Giglio, Mariano Cesare

AU - McGrath, John

AU - Obermair, Andreas

AU - Pellino, Gianluca

AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi

AU - Lal, Pawanindra

AU - Lorenzon, Laura

AU - De Angelis, Nicola

AU - Boni, Luigi

AU - Gupta, Sharmila

AU - Griffith, John P.

AU - Acheson, Austin G.

AU - Cecil, Tom D.

AU - Coleman, Mark G.

PY - 2020/4/6

Y1 - 2020/4/6

N2 - Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs.

AB - Introduction: There has been a constant increase in the number of published surgical videos with preference for open-access sources, but the proportion of videos undergoing peer-review prior to publication has markedly decreased, raising questions over quality of the educational content presented. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a standard framework for the appraisal of surgical videos submitted for presentation and publication, the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Methods: An international committee identified items for inclusion in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool and finalised the marking score utilising Delphi methodology. The tool was finally validated by anonymous evaluation of selected videos by a group of validators not involved in the tool development. Results: 9 items were included in the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool, with every item scoring from 0 (item not presented in the video) to 2 (item extensively presented in the video), with a total marking score ranging from 0 to 18. The LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool resulted highly accurate in identifying and selecting videos for acceptance for conference presentation and publication, with high level of internal consistency and generalisability. Conclusions: We propose that peer review in adherence to the LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool could enhance the overall quality of published video outputs.

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Video assessment tool

KW - Guidelines

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Surgical training

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

DO - 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4

M3 - Article

SN - 0930-2794

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

ER -

Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this