Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: post‐qualitative re‐turnings

Angelo Benozzo, Neil Carey, Michela Cozza, Constanse Elmenhorst, Nicola Fairchild, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Carol A. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Author 1:
They say they want to disturb the AcademicConferenceMachine.
Author 34:
What is anAcademicConferenceMachine?
Author 2:
Please do not go in that direction. Ask, for example, what does an AcademicConferenceMachine do?
Author 51:
Ok, so what does it do?
Author 6:
AcademicConferenceMachines are becoming so regulated and standardized that they might lose the possibility to produce different knowledge and to produce knowledge differently.
Author 227:
Do you think they succeeded?
Author 9999:
I do not know.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-106
Number of pages20
JournalGender, Work and Organization
Volume26
Issue number2
Early online date8 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Feb 2019

Keywords

  • AcademicConferenceMachine
  • academicwritingmachine
  • cyborg
  • earthworm
  • post‐qualitative research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disturbing the AcademicConferenceMachine: post‐qualitative re‐turnings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this