Abstract
Building investment has been identified as both a major determinant of, and a brake on, economic growth, results which are based on conflicting evidence drawn from a cross-section of countries in the post-1950 era. In contrast, this paper looks at the very long run, using annual UK data from the nineteenth century to the present day. Tests for cointegration and Granger Causality indicate a complex pattern of causality between equipment and structures investment and aggregate productivity. There seems to be a long-run steady state relationship and a series of error correcting mechanisms; results which do not support a policy of preferential treatment for equipment investment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-114 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Property Research |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Building cycles
- Growth
- Investment
- Productivity change
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does building investment affect economic growth?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver