Does the endowment of contributors make a difference in threshold public-good games?

Federica Alberti, Edward J. Cartwright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

157 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigate experimentally whether the endowment of potential contributors changes outcomes in threshold public good games. We find that the variance in contributions is significantly reduced for low and high levels of endowment when compared to an intermediate level of endowment. This difference emerges with experience. Evidence on whether the level of endowment influences the success rate at providing public goods is more mixed. We provide, however, a measure of endowment size that correlates with success rate. Our interpretation suggests that people find it hardest to coordinate on the provision of threshold public goods when endowments are of intermediate size. By intermediate we mean that the endowment is small enough that people need to contribute relatively a lot to fund the good, but also large enough that no one person is critical in providing the good.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-32
JournalFinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • WNU
  • Public Good
  • Threshold
  • Endowment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the endowment of contributors make a difference in threshold public-good games?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this