Abstract
Ecological validity refers to how well research reflects the conditions, interactions, and behaviors of the real-world setting its findings address. This study examines it as a core criterion for evaluating real-world evidence in service research. Generative AI operates in the research process, where it produces explanations, scenarios, stimuli, and synthetic respondents at near-zero cost. Distinguishing ecological validity from internal and external validity, extending it beyond experiments, and clarifying its service-specific relevance, the study reconceptualizes it around context, interactivity, temporality, and Generative AI mediation. It then specifies four functions through which multi-study designs accumulate real-world evidence and derives one design principle from each element, with a checklist that researchers, reviewers, and editors apply. A comparison with prior calls for relevance, ecological value, and impact in marketing, consumer research, public policy, and tourism locates what is specific to the service case.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The Service Industries Journal |
| Early online date | 31 Aug 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Early online - 31 Aug 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ecological validity as a foundation for service research rigor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver