TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecosystem approach to fisheries and marine ecosystem modelling
T2 - review of current approaches
AU - Stecken, Martin
AU - Failler, Pierre
N1 - NO EMBARGO
This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production, available online: http://www.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - This paper presents a review of existing approaches on ecosystem modelling and assesses them in the light of their capacity to integrate main elements of the ecosystem and their pertinence for fishery management. It completes existing EAF reviews by adding substantial analysis of the way to incorporate ecosystem complexities in models. The two most used approaches use nearly the same structure of boxes with flows of biomass for EwE or flows of elements for BM2. The main difference which gives a more efficient modelling is the method of estimates coming from the steady state model ECOPATH. This method is one of the strength of the EwE approach giving it a good predictive power. However, it is in the same time one of its main weakness in assuming an equilibrium situation that is far to be always the case. BM2 and biogeochemical models in general will have a better predictive power for low trophic levels. The problem in raising trophic levels is the higher number of parameters which raises in the same time the uncertainty of such models. The last model, ECGEM, is a recent model with an original approach. It presents, however, several important weaknesses as its ecological pertinence remains to be proved. Despite this, the model requires less parameters and supply methods needed by standard models and thus allows to process more complex situations.
AB - This paper presents a review of existing approaches on ecosystem modelling and assesses them in the light of their capacity to integrate main elements of the ecosystem and their pertinence for fishery management. It completes existing EAF reviews by adding substantial analysis of the way to incorporate ecosystem complexities in models. The two most used approaches use nearly the same structure of boxes with flows of biomass for EwE or flows of elements for BM2. The main difference which gives a more efficient modelling is the method of estimates coming from the steady state model ECOPATH. This method is one of the strength of the EwE approach giving it a good predictive power. However, it is in the same time one of its main weakness in assuming an equilibrium situation that is far to be always the case. BM2 and biogeochemical models in general will have a better predictive power for low trophic levels. The problem in raising trophic levels is the higher number of parameters which raises in the same time the uncertainty of such models. The last model, ECGEM, is a recent model with an original approach. It presents, however, several important weaknesses as its ecological pertinence remains to be proved. Despite this, the model requires less parameters and supply methods needed by standard models and thus allows to process more complex situations.
KW - ecosystem
KW - biodiversity
KW - biomass
KW - biogeochemical
KW - planktivorous
UR - http://www.esciencecentral.org/journals/fisheries-livestock-production.php
U2 - 10.4172/2332-2608.1000199
DO - 10.4172/2332-2608.1000199
M3 - Article
SN - 2332-2608
VL - 4
JO - Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
JF - Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production
IS - 4
M1 - 199
ER -