Editorial: Criteria for evaluating qualitative research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4798 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Within human resource development (HRD) there is an increasing call for in-depth qualitative research to enhance the evidence-base associated with the field. However, like the HRD community across the world, the qualitative research community is a disparate one. Different scholars draw on a range of research strategies that include (and are not limited to): case study, ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory, biographical, narrative, historical and participatory inquiry (Denzin, 2017). Qualitative research is a vibrant and emerging field; different epistemological and disciplinary positions are represented and, given the emergent and diverse nature of the field, it is not surprising that no consensus has been achieved about ‘rigor’. Indeed, even the term ‘rigor’ is contested (Barusch, Gringeri, & George, 2011).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Resource Development Quarterly
Early online date4 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 4 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial: Criteria for evaluating qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this