TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of pressure and stress cycles on fluid flow in hydraulically fractured, low-porosity, anisotropic sandstone
AU - Ibemesi, Peter
AU - Benson, Philip
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Emily Butcher for technical support in the Rock Mechanics Laboratory, and Smart Osarenogowu for thoughtful discussions. This research was funded by a Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF, Nigeria) to Peter Ibemesi and Philip Benson. This work was supported by the National Research Facility for Lab X-ray CT (NXCT) through EPSRC grant EP/T02593X/1.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge Emily Butcher for technical support in the Rock Mechanics Laboratory, and Smart Osarenogowu for thoughtful discussions. This research was funded by a Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF, Nigeria) to Peter Ibemesi and Philip Benson. This work was supported by the National Research Facility for Lab X-ray CT (NXCT) through EPSRC grant EP/T02593X/1.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Hydraulic fracture in deep rock masses is used across a variety of disciplines, from unconventional oil and gas to geothermal exploration. The overall efficiency of this process requires not only knowledge of the fracture mechanics of the rocks, but also how the newly generated fractures influence macro-scale pore connectivity. We here use cylindrical samples of Crab Orchard sandstone (90 mm length and 36 mm diameter), drilled with a central conduit of 9.6 mm diameter, to simulate hydraulic fracture. Results show that the anisotropy (mm-scale crossbedding orientation) affects breakdown pressure, and subsequent fluid flow. In experiments with samples cored parallel to bedding, breakdown pressures of 11.3 MPa, 27.7 MPa and 40.5 MPa are recorded at initial confining pressures at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. For samples cored perpendicular to bedding, breakdown pressure of 15.4 MPa, 27.4 MPa and 34.2 MPa were recorded at initial confining pressure at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. An increase in confining pressure after the initial fracture event often results in a significant decrease in flow rate through the newly generated fracture. We note that fluid flow recovers during a confining pressure “re-set” and that the ability of flow to recover is strongly dependent on sample anisotropy and initial confining pressure at injection.
AB - Hydraulic fracture in deep rock masses is used across a variety of disciplines, from unconventional oil and gas to geothermal exploration. The overall efficiency of this process requires not only knowledge of the fracture mechanics of the rocks, but also how the newly generated fractures influence macro-scale pore connectivity. We here use cylindrical samples of Crab Orchard sandstone (90 mm length and 36 mm diameter), drilled with a central conduit of 9.6 mm diameter, to simulate hydraulic fracture. Results show that the anisotropy (mm-scale crossbedding orientation) affects breakdown pressure, and subsequent fluid flow. In experiments with samples cored parallel to bedding, breakdown pressures of 11.3 MPa, 27.7 MPa and 40.5 MPa are recorded at initial confining pressures at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. For samples cored perpendicular to bedding, breakdown pressure of 15.4 MPa, 27.4 MPa and 34.2 MPa were recorded at initial confining pressure at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. An increase in confining pressure after the initial fracture event often results in a significant decrease in flow rate through the newly generated fracture. We note that fluid flow recovers during a confining pressure “re-set” and that the ability of flow to recover is strongly dependent on sample anisotropy and initial confining pressure at injection.
KW - Acoustic emissions
KW - Anisotropy
KW - Confining pressure
KW - Flow rate
KW - Tensile fracturing
KW - Tight sandstone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138521224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00603-022-03043-y
DO - 10.1007/s00603-022-03043-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85138521224
SN - 0723-2632
VL - 56
SP - 19
EP - 34
JO - Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
JF - Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
IS - 1
ER -