TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of shading and blocking in compact linear fresnel reflector field
AU - Sharma, Vashi
AU - Khanna, Sourav
AU - Nayak, Jayanta K.
AU - Kedare, Shireesh B.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - In a compact linear fresnel reflector field, 's' number of reflector-rows lying between two receivers can be configured in 2s ways. Each possible configuration will lead to different energy loss, electricity generation and cost of electricity. The variations in energy losses, energy collection by fluid, electricity generation and cost of electricity with length (L) and width (w) of aperture of a reflector-row, spacing between adjacent reflector-rows (p), number of reflector-rows (2n), receiver-height (H), collector-configuration and location have been studied. It is found that the collector configuration has no significant effect on annual shading. However, it affects annual energy losses due to cosine effect, blocking and the factors τ and α significantly. As a result, the cost of electricity can be improved significantly by varying collector configuration. The cost of electricity decreases with increment in p/w and later on, it starts increasing. The best p/w ratio corresponding to minimum cost of electricity is 1.44 for H/nw = 0.3 and 1.85 for H/nw = 0.7. The energy collection by fluid increases rapidly with increment in H/nw initially. However, beyond H/nw about 0.7, further increase in H/nw does not lead to significant increase in energy collection.
AB - In a compact linear fresnel reflector field, 's' number of reflector-rows lying between two receivers can be configured in 2s ways. Each possible configuration will lead to different energy loss, electricity generation and cost of electricity. The variations in energy losses, energy collection by fluid, electricity generation and cost of electricity with length (L) and width (w) of aperture of a reflector-row, spacing between adjacent reflector-rows (p), number of reflector-rows (2n), receiver-height (H), collector-configuration and location have been studied. It is found that the collector configuration has no significant effect on annual shading. However, it affects annual energy losses due to cosine effect, blocking and the factors τ and α significantly. As a result, the cost of electricity can be improved significantly by varying collector configuration. The cost of electricity decreases with increment in p/w and later on, it starts increasing. The best p/w ratio corresponding to minimum cost of electricity is 1.44 for H/nw = 0.3 and 1.85 for H/nw = 0.7. The energy collection by fluid increases rapidly with increment in H/nw initially. However, beyond H/nw about 0.7, further increase in H/nw does not lead to significant increase in energy collection.
KW - Blocking
KW - Compact linear fresnel reflector
KW - Cost of electricity
KW - Shading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956861765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.098
DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.098
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84956861765
SN - 0360-5442
VL - 94
SP - 633
EP - 653
JO - Energy
JF - Energy
ER -