TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for TP-AGB stars in high-redshift galaxies, and their effect on deriving stellar population parameters
AU - Maraston, C.
AU - Daddi, E.
AU - Renzini, A.
AU - Cimatti, A.
AU - Dickinson, M.
AU - Papovich, C.
AU - Pasquali, A.
AU - Pirzkal, N.
PY - 2006/11/20
Y1 - 2006/11/20
N2 - We explore the effects of using different stellar population models on estimates of star formation histories, ages, and
masses of high-redshift galaxies by fitting the SEDs with models by Maraston (hereafter M05) and by Bruzual &
Charlot (hereafter BC03). We focus on the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) phase of stellar
evolution, whose treatment is a source of major discrepancy. In this respect, BC03 models are representative of other
models whose treatment of the TP-AGB phase is similar. Moreover, M05 and BC03 models adopt stellar tracks with
different assumptions on convective overshooting. For our experiment we use a sample of high-z (1:4 ≲ z ≲ 2:7)
galaxies, for which rest-frame UV spectroscopy and spectroscopic redshifts are available, along with Spitzer IRAC and
MIPS photometry from GOODS. The mid-UV spectra of these galaxies exhibit features typical of A- or F-type stars,
indicative of ages in the range ∼0.2-2Gyr,when the contribution of TP-AGB stars is expected to be maximum. We find
that the TP-AGB phase plays a key role in the interpretation of the Spitzer data,where the rest-frame near-IR is sampled.
Generally, M05 models give better fits than BC03 models and indicate systematically lower ages and lower masses (by
∼60%, on average). Photometric redshifts derived using M05 models are also in better agreement with the spectroscopic
ones, especially when the rest-frame near-IR fluxes from Spitzer IRAC are included in the fit.We argue that the
different results are primarily a consequence of the different treatment of the TP-AGB phase, although other differences
in the input stellar evolution also contribute. This work provides a first direct evidence for a strong contribution by
TP-AGB stars to the SED of galaxies in the high-redshift universe (z ∼ 2).
AB - We explore the effects of using different stellar population models on estimates of star formation histories, ages, and
masses of high-redshift galaxies by fitting the SEDs with models by Maraston (hereafter M05) and by Bruzual &
Charlot (hereafter BC03). We focus on the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) phase of stellar
evolution, whose treatment is a source of major discrepancy. In this respect, BC03 models are representative of other
models whose treatment of the TP-AGB phase is similar. Moreover, M05 and BC03 models adopt stellar tracks with
different assumptions on convective overshooting. For our experiment we use a sample of high-z (1:4 ≲ z ≲ 2:7)
galaxies, for which rest-frame UV spectroscopy and spectroscopic redshifts are available, along with Spitzer IRAC and
MIPS photometry from GOODS. The mid-UV spectra of these galaxies exhibit features typical of A- or F-type stars,
indicative of ages in the range ∼0.2-2Gyr,when the contribution of TP-AGB stars is expected to be maximum. We find
that the TP-AGB phase plays a key role in the interpretation of the Spitzer data,where the rest-frame near-IR is sampled.
Generally, M05 models give better fits than BC03 models and indicate systematically lower ages and lower masses (by
∼60%, on average). Photometric redshifts derived using M05 models are also in better agreement with the spectroscopic
ones, especially when the rest-frame near-IR fluxes from Spitzer IRAC are included in the fit.We argue that the
different results are primarily a consequence of the different treatment of the TP-AGB phase, although other differences
in the input stellar evolution also contribute. This work provides a first direct evidence for a strong contribution by
TP-AGB stars to the SED of galaxies in the high-redshift universe (z ∼ 2).
KW - galaxies : evolution
KW - galaxies : formation
KW - galaxies : high-redshift
KW - stars : AGBand post-AGB
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 652
SP - 85
EP - 96
JO - The Astrophysical Journal
JF - The Astrophysical Journal
IS - 1
ER -