TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the evidence for dynamical dark energy
AU - Zhao, Gong-Bo
AU - Crittenden, Robert G.
AU - Pogosian, Levon
AU - Zhang, Xinmin
N1 - 5 pages, 2 figures, accepted to PRL
PY - 2012/10/26
Y1 - 2012/10/26
N2 - We apply a new nonparametric Bayesian method for reconstructing the evolution history of the equation of state w of dark energy, based on applying a correlated prior for w(z), to a collection of cosmological data. We combine the latest supernova (SNLS 3 year or Union 2.1), cosmic microwave background, redshift space distortion, and the baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements (including BOSS, WiggleZ, and 6dF) and find that the cosmological constant appears consistent with current data, but that a dynamical dark energy model which evolves from w<−1 at z∼0.25 to w>−1 at higher redshift is mildly favored. Estimates of the Bayesian evidence show little preference between the cosmological constant model and the dynamical model for a range of correlated prior choices. Looking towards future data, we find that the best fit models for current data could be well distinguished from the ΛCDM model by observations such as Planck and Euclid-like surveys.
AB - We apply a new nonparametric Bayesian method for reconstructing the evolution history of the equation of state w of dark energy, based on applying a correlated prior for w(z), to a collection of cosmological data. We combine the latest supernova (SNLS 3 year or Union 2.1), cosmic microwave background, redshift space distortion, and the baryonic acoustic oscillation measurements (including BOSS, WiggleZ, and 6dF) and find that the cosmological constant appears consistent with current data, but that a dynamical dark energy model which evolves from w<−1 at z∼0.25 to w>−1 at higher redshift is mildly favored. Estimates of the Bayesian evidence show little preference between the cosmological constant model and the dynamical model for a range of correlated prior choices. Looking towards future data, we find that the best fit models for current data could be well distinguished from the ΛCDM model by observations such as Planck and Euclid-like surveys.
KW - astro-ph.CO
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.171301
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.171301
M3 - Article
SN - 0031-9007
VL - 109
SP - 171301
JO - Physical Review Letters
JF - Physical Review Letters
ER -