Exploring advertiser's expectations of advertising agency services

Sarah Turnbull, Colin Wheeler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1528 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    While organizational ethnographers have embraced the concept of self-reflexivity, problems remain. In this article we argue that the prevalent assumption that self-reflexivity is the sole responsibility of the individual researcher limits its scope for understanding organizations. To address this, we propose an innovative method of collective reflection that is inspired by ideas from cultural and feminist anthropology. The value of this method is illustrated through an analysis of two ethnographic case studies, involving a ‘pair interview’ method. This collective approach surfaced self-reflexive accounts, in which aspects of the research encounter that still tend to be downplayed within organizational ethnographies, including emotion, intersubjectivity and the operation of power dynamics, were allowed to emerge. The approach also facilitated a second contribution through the conceptualization of organizational ethnography as a unique endeavour that represents a collision between one ‘world of work’: the university, with a second: the researched organization. We find that this ‘collision’ exacerbates the emotionality of ethnographic research, highlighting the refusal of ‘researched’ organizations to be domesticated by the specific norms of academia. Our article concludes by drawing out implications for the practice of self-reflexivity within organizational ethnography.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)587-601
    JournalJournal of Marketing Communications
    Volume22
    Issue number6
    Early online date18 Jun 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Keywords

    • WNU
    • emotion
    • ethnography
    • methods
    • organization
    • self-reflexivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring advertiser's expectations of advertising agency services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this