Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Exploring variation in infants' preference for infant‐directed speech: evidence from a multi‐site study in Africa

  • Angeline Sin Mei Tsui
  • , Alexandra Carstensen
  • , George Kachergis
  • , Anjie Cao
  • , Amina Abubakar
  • , Mulat Asnake
  • , Oumar Barry
  • , Dana M. Basnight‐Brown
  • , Dangkat Bentu
  • , Christina Bergmann
  • , Evans Binan Dami
  • , Natalie Boll‐Avetisyan
  • , Marguerite de Jongh
  • , Yatma Diop
  • , Reginald Akuoko Duah
  • , Esther Herrmann
  • , Chaning Jang
  • , Simon Kizito
  • , Tilinao Lamba
  • , Limbika Maliwichi‐Senganimalunje
  • Joyce Marangu, Maya Mathur, Catherine V. Mbagaya, Demeke Mekonnen Mengistie, Carmen Milton, Febronie Mushimiyimana, Mikateko Ndhambi, Irene Ngina, Eunice Njoroge, Paul Odhiambo Oburu, Asana Okocha, Paul Okyere Omane, Anisha Singh, Andrew S. Ssemata, Juliette Unyuzumutima, Henriette Zeidler, Casey Lew‐Williams, Michael C. Frank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Infants show a preference for infant-directed speech (IDS) over adult-directed speech (ADS). This preference has been linked to infants' language processing and word learning in experimental settings, and also correlates with later language outcomes. Recently, the cross-cultural consistency of infants' IDS preference has been confirmed by large-scale, multisite replication studies, but conclusions from these studies were primarily based on participants from North America and Europe. The current study addressed this sampling bias via a large-scale, multisite study of infants (3–15 months) across communities in Africa. We investigated whether participants showed a preference for IDS over ADS, and if so, whether the magnitude of their preference differs from effects documented in other populations of infants. Across six sites (total N = 200), we observed a preference for IDS over ADS (𝛽IDSvs.ADS = 0.06), suggesting that infants look on average 6% longer on the IDS trials than the ADS trials. There was no significant difference between African infants in this study and a method-matched subsample of infants from prior studies of IDS preference. This study provides new evidence on the generalizability of IDS preference and looking-time methods more broadly, while also highlighting some of the challenges of global big team science.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70242
Number of pages48
JournalDevelopmental Science
Volume29
Issue number5
Early online date7 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online - 7 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • Africa
  • generalizability
  • infants
  • infant-directed speech
  • reproducibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring variation in infants' preference for infant‐directed speech: evidence from a multi‐site study in Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this