Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’

Alan Costall; I. Leudar; Vasu Reddy

doi:10.1177/0959354306062533

Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’

Alan Costall, I. Leudar, Vasu Reddy

Centre for Interaction, Development and Diversity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We are puzzled by Szilvia Papp's response to the recent Special Issue of Theory & Psychology devoted to critiques of and alternatives to Theory of Mind. Although Papp is a linguist with a special interest not only in Theory of Mind but also in ‘Relevance Theory’, we can find no reference in her response to the critical issues raised in the Special Issue, nor any defence of the dualist metaphysics behind Theory of Mind. Instead, she presents us with a further demonstration that if one starts from dualistic premises, then one does indeed end up with something along the lines of Theory of Mind with its resort to ‘mind-reading’.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	163-167
Number of pages	5
Journal	Theory & Psychology
Volume	16
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306062533
Publication status	Published - Apr 2006

Access to Document

10.1177/0959354306062533

Cite this

@article{d8fd880dd1ec427eaf5abc33afee89ae,

title = "Failing to see the irony in {\textquoteleft}mind-reading{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "We are puzzled by Szilvia Papp's response to the recent Special Issue of Theory & Psychology devoted to critiques of and alternatives to Theory of Mind. Although Papp is a linguist with a special interest not only in Theory of Mind but also in {\textquoteleft}Relevance Theory{\textquoteright}, we can find no reference in her response to the critical issues raised in the Special Issue, nor any defence of the dualist metaphysics behind Theory of Mind. Instead, she presents us with a further demonstration that if one starts from dualistic premises, then one does indeed end up with something along the lines of Theory of Mind with its resort to {\textquoteleft}mind-reading{\textquoteright}.",

author = "Alan Costall and I. Leudar and Vasu Reddy",

year = "2006",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1177/0959354306062533",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "163--167",

journal = "Theory & Psychology",

issn = "0959-3543",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’

AU - Costall, Alan

AU - Leudar, I.

AU - Reddy, Vasu

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - We are puzzled by Szilvia Papp's response to the recent Special Issue of Theory & Psychology devoted to critiques of and alternatives to Theory of Mind. Although Papp is a linguist with a special interest not only in Theory of Mind but also in ‘Relevance Theory’, we can find no reference in her response to the critical issues raised in the Special Issue, nor any defence of the dualist metaphysics behind Theory of Mind. Instead, she presents us with a further demonstration that if one starts from dualistic premises, then one does indeed end up with something along the lines of Theory of Mind with its resort to ‘mind-reading’.

AB - We are puzzled by Szilvia Papp's response to the recent Special Issue of Theory & Psychology devoted to critiques of and alternatives to Theory of Mind. Although Papp is a linguist with a special interest not only in Theory of Mind but also in ‘Relevance Theory’, we can find no reference in her response to the critical issues raised in the Special Issue, nor any defence of the dualist metaphysics behind Theory of Mind. Instead, she presents us with a further demonstration that if one starts from dualistic premises, then one does indeed end up with something along the lines of Theory of Mind with its resort to ‘mind-reading’.

U2 - 10.1177/0959354306062533

DO - 10.1177/0959354306062533

M3 - Article

SN - 0959-3543

VL - 16

SP - 163

EP - 167

JO - Theory & Psychology

JF - Theory & Psychology

IS - 2

ER -

Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this