Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


We are puzzled by Szilvia Papp's response to the recent Special Issue of Theory & Psychology devoted to critiques of and alternatives to Theory of Mind. Although Papp is a linguist with a special interest not only in Theory of Mind but also in ‘Relevance Theory’, we can find no reference in her response to the critical issues raised in the Special Issue, nor any defence of the dualist metaphysics behind Theory of Mind. Instead, she presents us with a further demonstration that if one starts from dualistic premises, then one does indeed end up with something along the lines of Theory of Mind with its resort to ‘mind-reading’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalTheory & Psychology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006


Dive into the research topics of 'Failing to see the irony in ‘mind-reading’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this