Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al

Jim Smith

doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

353 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Early online date	14 Feb 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007
Publication status	Early online - 14 Feb 2019

Keywords

RCUK
NERC
NE/R009619/1

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

Field evidence of significant effectsAccepted author manuscript (Post-print), 344 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0265931X19300505

Cite this

Smith, J. (2019). Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

@article{05d58c342fe6423696891ff94a0e54ce,

title = "Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al",

keywords = "RCUK, NERC, NE/R009619/1",

author = "Jim Smith",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Radioactivity",

issn = "0265-931X",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Smith, J 2019, 'Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al', Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al. / Smith, Jim.
In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 14.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al

AU - Smith, Jim

PY - 2019/2/14

Y1 - 2019/2/14

KW - RCUK

KW - NERC

KW - NE/R009619/1

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007

M3 - Article

SN - 0265-931X

JO - Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

JF - Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

ER -

Smith J. Field evidence of significant effects of radiation on wildlife at chronic low dose rates is weak and often misleading. A comment on “Is non-human species radiosensitivity in the lab a good indicator of that in the field? Making the comparison more robust” by Beaugelin-Seiller et al. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2019 Feb 14. Epub 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.007