Forcing the issue: aromatic tuning facilitates stimulus- independent modulation of a two-component signaling circuit

Morten H. H. Nørholm, Gunnar von Heijne, Roger R. Draheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

130 Downloads (Pure)


Two-component signaling circuits allow bacteria to detect and respond to external stimuli. Unfortunately, the input stimulus remains unidentified for the majority of these circuits. Therefore, development of a synthetic method for stimulus-independent modulation of these circuits is highly desirable because particular physiological or developmental processes could be controlled for biotechnological purposes without the need to identify the stimulus itself. Here, we demonstrate that aromatic tuning, i.e., repositioning the aromatic residues commonly found at the cytoplasmic end of the receptor (EnvZ) transmembrane domain, facilitates stimulus-independent modulation of signal output from the EnvZ/OmpR osmosensing circuit of Escherichia coli. We found that these osmosensing circuits retained the ability to respond appropriately to increased external osmolarity, suggesting that the tuned receptors were not locked in a single conformation. We also noted that circuits containing aromatically tuned variants became more sensitive to changes in the receptor concentration than their wild-type counterpart, suggesting a new way to study mechanisms underpinning receptor concentration-dependent robustness. We believe that aromatic tuning has several advantages compared to previous methods aimed at stimulus-independent modulation of receptors and that it will be generally applicable to a wide-range of two-component circuits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)474-481
Number of pages8
JournalACS Synthetic Biology
Issue number4
Early online date27 Aug 2014
Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Forcing the issue: aromatic tuning facilitates stimulus- independent modulation of a two-component signaling circuit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this