TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequentist cosmological constraints from full-shape clustering measurements in DESI DR1
AU - DESI Collaboration
AU - Morawetz, James
AU - Zhang, Hanyu
AU - Bonici, Marco
AU - Percival, Will
AU - Crespi, Andrea
AU - Aguilar, Jessica Nicole
AU - Ahlen, Steven
AU - Bianchi, Davide
AU - Brooks, David
AU - Castander, Francisco Javier
AU - Claybaugh, Todd
AU - Cole, Shaun
AU - Cuceu, Andrei
AU - Macorra, Axel de la
AU - de Mattia, Arnaud
AU - Dey, Biprateep
AU - Doel, Peter
AU - Ferraro, Simone
AU - Font-Ribera, Andreu
AU - Forero-Romero, Jaime E.
AU - Gaztañaga, Enrique
AU - Gontcho, Satya Gontcho A
AU - Gutierrez, Gaston
AU - Hahn, ChangHoon
AU - Honscheid, Klaus
AU - Huterer, Dragan
AU - Ishak, Mustapha
AU - Joyce, Dick
AU - Kehoe, Robert
AU - Kirkby, David
AU - Kisner, Theodore
AU - Lahav, Ofer
AU - Lambert, Andrew
AU - Landriau, Martin
AU - Guillou, Laurent Le
AU - Manera, Marc
AU - Miquel, Ramon
AU - Mueller, Eva-Maria
AU - Nadathur, Seshadri
AU - Newman, Jeffrey A.
AU - Niz, Gustavo
AU - Palanque-Delabrouille, Nathalie
AU - Prada, Francisco
AU - Pérez-Ràfols, Ignasi
AU - Rossi, Graziano
AU - Samushia, Lado
AU - Sanchez, Eusebio
AU - Schlegel, David
AU - Schubnell, Michael
AU - Silber, Joseph Harry
N1 - 23 pages, 4 figures, comments welcome
PY - 2026/8/3
Y1 - 2026/8/3
N2 - We perform a frequentist analysis using the standard profile likelihood method for clustering measurements from Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). While Bayesian inferences for Effective Field Theory models of galaxy clustering can be highly sensitive to the choice of priors for extended cosmological models, frequentist inferences are not susceptible to such effects. We compare Bayesian and frequentist constraints for the parameter set $\{\sigma_8, H_0, \Omega_{\rm{m}}, w_0, w_a\}$ when fitting to the full-shape of the power spectrum multipoles, the post-reconstruction Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements, as well as external datasets from the CMB and type Ia supernovae measurements. Bayesian prior effects are very significant for the $w_0w_a$CDM model; while the $1 \sigma$ frequentist confidence intervals encompass the maximum a posteriori (MAP), the Bayesian credible intervals almost always exclude the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) and the MAP - indicating strong prior volume projection effects - unless supernovae data are included. We observe limited prior effects for the $\Lambda$CDM model, due to the reduced number of parameters. When DESI full-shape and BAO data are jointly fit, we obtain the following $1\sigma$ frequentist confidence intervals for $\Lambda$CDM ($w_0w_a$CDM): $\sigma_8 = 0.867^{+0.048}_{-0.041} , \ H_0 = 68.91^{+0.80}_{-0.79} \ \rm{km \ s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}} , \ \Omega_{\rm{m}} = 0.3038\pm0.0110$ ($\sigma_8 = 0.793^{+0.069}_{-0.048} , \ H_0 = 64.9^{+4.8}_{-2.8} \ \rm{km \ s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}} , \ \Omega_{\rm{m}} = 0.369^{+0.029}_{-0.059}$ , $w_0 = -0.24^{+0.17}_{-0.64}$ , $w_a = -2.5^{+1.9}_{}$), corresponding to 0.7$\sigma$, 0.3$\sigma$, 0.7$\sigma$ (1.9$\sigma$, 3.4$\sigma$, 5.6$\sigma$, 5.5$\sigma$, 5.6$\sigma$) shifts between the MLE relative to the Bayesian posterior mean for $\Lambda$CDM ($w_0w_a$CDM) respectively.
AB - We perform a frequentist analysis using the standard profile likelihood method for clustering measurements from Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). While Bayesian inferences for Effective Field Theory models of galaxy clustering can be highly sensitive to the choice of priors for extended cosmological models, frequentist inferences are not susceptible to such effects. We compare Bayesian and frequentist constraints for the parameter set $\{\sigma_8, H_0, \Omega_{\rm{m}}, w_0, w_a\}$ when fitting to the full-shape of the power spectrum multipoles, the post-reconstruction Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements, as well as external datasets from the CMB and type Ia supernovae measurements. Bayesian prior effects are very significant for the $w_0w_a$CDM model; while the $1 \sigma$ frequentist confidence intervals encompass the maximum a posteriori (MAP), the Bayesian credible intervals almost always exclude the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) and the MAP - indicating strong prior volume projection effects - unless supernovae data are included. We observe limited prior effects for the $\Lambda$CDM model, due to the reduced number of parameters. When DESI full-shape and BAO data are jointly fit, we obtain the following $1\sigma$ frequentist confidence intervals for $\Lambda$CDM ($w_0w_a$CDM): $\sigma_8 = 0.867^{+0.048}_{-0.041} , \ H_0 = 68.91^{+0.80}_{-0.79} \ \rm{km \ s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}} , \ \Omega_{\rm{m}} = 0.3038\pm0.0110$ ($\sigma_8 = 0.793^{+0.069}_{-0.048} , \ H_0 = 64.9^{+4.8}_{-2.8} \ \rm{km \ s^{-1}Mpc^{-1}} , \ \Omega_{\rm{m}} = 0.369^{+0.029}_{-0.059}$ , $w_0 = -0.24^{+0.17}_{-0.64}$ , $w_a = -2.5^{+1.9}_{}$), corresponding to 0.7$\sigma$, 0.3$\sigma$, 0.7$\sigma$ (1.9$\sigma$, 3.4$\sigma$, 5.6$\sigma$, 5.5$\sigma$, 5.6$\sigma$) shifts between the MLE relative to the Bayesian posterior mean for $\Lambda$CDM ($w_0w_a$CDM) respectively.
KW - astro-ph.CO
KW - cosmological parameters from LSS
KW - Frequentist statistics
KW - Bayesian reasoning
KW - galaxy clustering
U2 - 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/08/001
DO - 10.1088/1475-7516/2026/08/001
M3 - Article
SN - 1475-7516
VL - 2026
JO - Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
JF - Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
IS - 08
M1 - 001
ER -