Abstract
Constitutive modelling of nonlinear isotropic elastic materials requires a general formulation of the strain–energy function in terms of invariants, or equivalently in terms of the principal stretches. Yet, when choosing a particular form of a model, the representation in terms of either the principal invariants or stretches becomes important, since a judicious choice between one or the other can lead to a better encapsulation and interpretation of much of the behaviour of a given material. Here, we introduce a family of generalised isotropic invariants, including a member , which collapses to the classical first and second invariant of incompressible elasticity when is 2 or -2, respectively. Then, we consider incompressible materials for which the strain–energy can be approximated by a function that solely depends on this invariant . A natural question is to find that best captures the finite deformation of a given material. We first show that there exist pseudo-universal relationships that are independent of the choice of, and which only depend on. Then, on using these pseudo-universal relationships, we show that one can obtain the exponent that best fits a given dataset before seeking a functional form for the strain–energy function. This two-step process delivers the best model that is a function of a single invariant. We show, on using specific examples, that this procedure leads to an excellent and easy to use approximation of constitutive models.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 105883 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids |
Volume | 193 |
Early online date | 20 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2024 |
Keywords
- Hyperelasticity
- Constitutive modelling
- Generalised isotropic invariant
- Pseudo-universal relationships