Handling imprecise evaluations in multiple criteria decision aiding and robust ordinal regression by n-point intervals

Salvatore Corrente, Salvatore Greco, Roman Słowiński

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

147 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We consider imprecise evaluation of alternatives in multiple criteria ranking problems. The imprecise evaluations are represented by n-point intervals which are defined by the largest interval of possible evaluations and by its subintervals sequentially nested one in another. This sequence of subintervals is associated with an increasing sequence of plausibility, such that the plausibility of a subinterval is greater than the plausibility of the subinterval containing it. We explain the intuition that stands behind this proposal, and we show the advantage of n-point intervals compared to other methods dealing with imprecise evaluations. Although n-point intervals can be applied in any multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) method, in this paper, we focus on their application in robust ordinal regression which, unlike other MCDA methods, takes into account all compatible instances of an adopted preference model, which reproduce an indirect preference information provided by the decision maker. An illustrative example shows how the method can be applied in practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-157
Number of pages31
JournalFuzzy Optimization and Decision Making
Volume16
Issue number2
Early online date31 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Imprecise evaluations
  • n-point intervals
  • Multiple criteria decision aiding
  • Robust ordinal regression
  • Preference relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Handling imprecise evaluations in multiple criteria decision aiding and robust ordinal regression by n-point intervals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this