How sure are you that this is the man you saw? Child witnesses can use confidence judgments to identify a target

Kalia C. Bruer, Ryan Fitzgerald, Heather L. Price, James D. Sauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

297 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We tested whether an alternative lineup procedure designed to minimize problematic influences (e.g., metacognitive development) on decision criteria could be effectively used by children and improve child eyewitness identification performance relative to a standard identification task. 516 children (6- to 13-year-olds) watched a video of a target reading word lists and, the next day, made confidence ratings for each lineup member or standard categorical decisions for 8 lineup members presented sequentially. Two algorithms were applied to classify confidence ratings into categorical decisions and facilitate comparisons across conditions. The classification algorithms produced accuracy rates for the confidence rating procedure that were comparable to the categorical procedure. These findings demonstrate that children can use a ratings-based procedure to discriminate between previously seen and unseen faces. In turn, this invites more nuanced and empirical consideration of ratings-based identification evidence as a probabilistic index of guilt that may attenuate problematic social influences on child witnesses’ decision criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-555
Number of pages15
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How sure are you that this is the man you saw? Child witnesses can use confidence judgments to identify a target'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this