If we expand the criteria for what makes a medical intervention invasive, we should include ingestion, not mental distress

Paul Afleck
, Julia Cons
, Simon Kolstoe

Institute of Life Sciences and Healthcare

Research output: Other contribution › Blog posts

Original language	English
Type	Blog post
Publisher	Journal of Medical Ethics
Publication status	Published - 6 Mar 2024

Access to Document

https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2024/03/06/if-we-expand-the-criteria-for-what-makes-a-medical-intervention-invasive-we-should-include-ingestion-not-mental-distress/

Cite this

Afleck, P., Cons, J., & Kolstoe, S. (2024, Mar 6). If we expand the criteria for what makes a medical intervention invasive, we should include ingestion, not mental distress. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2024/03/06/if-we-expand-the-criteria-for-what-makes-a-medical-intervention-invasive-we-should-include-ingestion-not-mental-distress/

@misc{23591dc1036440d59a92359a62368efe,

title = "If we expand the criteria for what makes a medical intervention invasive, we should include ingestion, not mental distress",

author = "Paul Afleck and Julia Cons and Simon Kolstoe",

year = "2024",

month = mar,

day = "6",

language = "English",

publisher = "Journal of Medical Ethics",

type = "Other",

}