Individual differences in commitment to value-based beliefs and the amplification of perceived belief dissimilarity effects: commitment to beliefs and belief dissimilarity effects

Matthew A. Maxwell-Smith, Clive Seligman, Paul Conway, Irene Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The commitment to beliefs (CTB) framework (Maxwell-Smith & Esses, 2012) proposes that there are individual differences in the extent to which people generally follow beliefs that are a reflection of their values. The current research hypothesized that CTB would amplify the effects of perceived belief dissimilarity or incompatibility, such that individuals higher in CTB would display more pronounced reactions to belief-relevant groups, events, or individuals seen as incompatible with their value-based beliefs. We tested our hypothesis in three studies that assessed participants' CTB and their perceptions of belief dissimilarity or incompatibility with regard to other religious groups (Study 1), political parties during a national election (Study 2), and their romantic partner (Study 3). CTB amplified the effects of perceived belief dissimilarity or incompatibility on people's biases toward other religious groups, voting intentions and behavior in a national election, and their evaluative and behavioral responses toward their romantic partner. These results collectively suggest that perceptions of belief dissimilarity or incompatibility are particularly important cues for individuals with higher levels of CTB as they encounter other people or events that are relevant to their beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-141
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume83
Issue number2
Early online date27 Feb 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in commitment to value-based beliefs and the amplification of perceived belief dissimilarity effects: commitment to beliefs and belief dissimilarity effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this